360 Degree Feedback: 5 Common Mistakes Made
Have you ever wondered, “How do I effectively use 360 degree feedback to reveal predictors of success and make corrective decisions about the people working at my company?”
John Rice recently posted a blog, “360 Degree Feedback or face-to-face conversation?” in which he says it’s not an either/or, but a both.
“To all intents and purposes, we would agree that an organizational culture which can support open, honest, face-to-face feedback which is given well and received well, is a desirable state–leadership should indeed encourage and lead by example in fostering such an environment.” John continues with, “However, 360 degree feedback still has a place as a formal, structured way of gathering feedback which should complement such conversation; it isn’t ‘either/or.’”
John makes a great point that the face to face conversations and 360 degree feedback should go hand in hand and be part of the same process. But, just like a poorly planned conversation can get off track, so can 360 degree feedback if it’s not done correctly.
In our webcast, “5 Common Mistakes Made in 360 Degree Feedback Surveys,” we’ll take an in-depth look at common mistakes made and essential practices needed in 360 degree feedback. During the webcast, we will share the:
- Dangers of using generic rather than role specific competencies
- Pros and cons of using unmoderated vs. moderated reviews
- Challenges encountered by not mapping learning resources to competencies
- Best practices to maximize development based on the review
360 Degree Feedback: One Solution to Keep Employees Engaged
A recent survey by Globoforce and the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) reveals that 45% of HR leaders don’t think annual performance reviews are an accurate appraisal for employees’ work, and 42% don’t think employees are rewarded fairly for their job performance. The same survey also points out that employee engagement remains the primary issue facing companies today. According to the survey, 94% of respondents said […]
How To Keep Top Employees Engaged and From Leaving
A study last year by the Corporate Executive Board indicated that “25 percent of employer-identified, high-potential employees plan to leave their current companies within the year, as compared to only 10 percent in 2006.” The study also found that 40% of the internal job moves for high potentials ended in failure. We recently talked about […]
How Mature Is Your Talent Management Process?
The foundations of talent management that underpin these activities are often formed by a combination of resources, such as role profiles, HR databases, training and development provisions, internal/external coaches and mentors, executive search functions, and the data kept and maintained in a responsible manner (in line with data protection laws, for instance). Most importantly, your […]